There's not much to see at api.tripmile.app — the server returns a 403 error to anyone who isn't a registered client. That's perfectly normal for a backend API, but it also means we can't verify who runs the show from this subdomain alone. The domain tripmile.app suggests a travel mileage service, and the technical infrastructure (AWS CloudFront, valid TLS) looks legitimate. But travel services that handle personal data and payments typically have established domain histories, clear company information, and customer support channels. Here, the domain has no web archive history, no social media presence, and no public contact details. If you're considering using an app or service that relies on this API, your first step should be to check tripmile.app directly. Look for a proper about page, terms of service, and a physical address. Without that, there's no way to know if api.tripmile.app is a legitimate backend or a temporary shell. The absence of red flags is not the same as a green light.
In plain English
This API endpoint is essentially a black box. The technical setup is fine — modern encryption, clean blacklists, AWS hosting — but there's almost no public information about who runs it. The domain is new and the parent service (tripmile.app) doesn't have a visible track record either. Proceed with caution until you can verify the company behind it.
Where the score comes from
The connection uses modern encryption (TLS 1.3) with a valid certificate from Amazon. The only blemish is that the server still accepts older, deprecated TLS versions — a minor oversight for an API endpoint, not a critical flaw.
Who is behind this API? We can't tell. The .app TLD hides WHOIS data, there's no about page, no contact info, and the domain is too new to have any web archive history. For a service that likely handles user data, that's a real gap.
No blacklists, no malware flags, but also no track record. The domain isn't in the top million websites and has zero Wayback Machine snapshots. It's a blank slate — neither good nor bad, but absence of history is itself a signal to be cautious.
An API subdomain doesn't need its own about page, but the complete lack of any visible ownership or way to contact someone is concerning for a service that likely integrates with a travel app. The front door is locked and no one is answering.
We couldn't check for legal pages because the site blocks automated access. That's normal for a backend, but if the parent business handles EU user data, missing privacy terms would be a problem. We simply don't know enough to score higher or lower.
Solid hosting on AWS CloudFront with fast response times and multiple IPs. DNSSEC isn't enabled, but that's common. No email setup — expected for an API. Technically, the setup is professional.
What we checked
Run this site? Show your score.
Add a trust badge so visitors can see your live score for themselves.
Get your badge →