Home› News & Media› blokeball.com
Use Caution

Not sure — double-check blokeball.com first

50/ 100 trust score
Industry: News & Media Checked Jun 27, 2026 News & Media average: 63 39 signals

In plain English

Blokeball.com is a very new football banter site launched just weeks ago. While it looks like a legitimate fan project with an About page and basic security, its extreme youth and lack of any online history mean there's little evidence to rely on yet. Approach with the same caution you'd use for any brand-new website.

Cross-referenced 39 live signals from Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, WHOIS and more on Jun 27, 2026. How we score →

Where the score comes from

We look at six areas. Here's how blokeball.com did in each.
75
Security

Solid basic security with a valid certificate and modern encryption, though the site doesn't set additional browser protections—standard for a simple blog.

40
Identity

The domain was registered just 20 days ago, which is the biggest concern for any site. While new sites can be legitimate, this one hasn't had time to build a track record.

60
Reputation

The site hasn't been indexed by the Wayback Machine and has no external reviews, which is normal for a site this new. No blacklist issues.

70
Transparency

The site has an About page but no direct contact information or social media links. For a football banter blog, this level of transparency is acceptable, though contact info would add trust.

80
Compliance

Missing privacy policy and terms of service, but this is typical for a non-commercial blog that doesn't collect user data or process payments.

70
Infrastructure

Basic but functional infrastructure: standard hosting, email through Google, and no DNS issues. Missing DNSSEC is common for small sites.

What we checked

The 39 signals behind this report.
Security & Transport
Certificate Issuer
Let's Encrypt
Google Web Risk
Clean
SSL Certificate
Valid
Security Headers
0 of 6
Server
Apache
TLS Version
TLS 1.3
Identity & WHOIS
About Page
Found
Branding
Complete
Business Disclosure
Not found
Contact Info
Not found
Domain Age
20 days
Domain Expiry
2027-06-07T11:04:19Z
Legal Pages
Partial
Registrar
Name.com, Inc.
Infrastructure & DNS
DMARC Record
p=none (monitoring only)
DNS Blacklists
Clean
DNS Resolution
1 IP(s)
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNSSEC
unsigned
Email (MX Records)
1 record(s)
Hosting Network (ASN)
AS26347 DREAMHOST-AS
Name Servers
3 server(s)
Page Load Time
1593ms
Platform
WordPress
Reputation & Reach
Open Graph Type
article
Page Description
Welcome to BlokeBall. Not super football fan, but still need to know all about it so you can chat about it down the pub?...
Page Heading
World Cup2026
Page Language
en-GB
Page Title
BlokeBall FC - the home of easy football bants
Schema Description
Sound like you know football. Even if you don't.
Schema Name
BlokeBall FC
Sitemap
5 pages
Social Media Presence
None found
Structured Data
Found
Tranco Rank
Not ranked
Trustpilot
No Trustpilot profile
Web Archive History
No archive found
Website Status
Online
robots.txt
Present

Run this site? Show your score.

Add a trust badge so visitors can see your live score for themselves.

Get your badge →
verified.fyi
blokeball.com
50
N Partner pick
Better safe than sorry. Stay covered everywhere: NordVPN's Threat Protection blocks known scam sites before they load.
Try NordVPN →

Blokeball.com presents itself as a lighthearted football news site for casual fans who want to sound knowledgeable about the World Cup. The site has an About page and uses WordPress, which is common for hobby blogs. However, the domain was registered less than a month ago—a red flag for any site that hasn't proven itself over time. Most established football blogs have years of history and an archive of articles. Blokeball lacks contact information, social media profiles, and a privacy policy. While not unusual for a small personal project, these absences make it harder to verify the operator's intentions. The site doesn't ask for payments or logins, which reduces risk, but you should still treat it as unproven. No scam reports have surfaced, but the lack of track record means there's no evidence of legitimacy either. If you're just reading content, it's probably fine, but don't share personal data.

More News & Media sites

How similar sites score. See all →