Is cambridge.org legit?

90
/ 100
Trusted
Industry: Education

This website is trusted and appears to be a legitimate and secure online presence. While there are a few minor areas for improvement, like the upcoming SSL certificate renewal and lack of structured data, its core security, identity, and infrastructure are robust.

Education average: 84/100 · based on 35 sites

Checked: April 27, 2026 at 6:26 PM UTC

Is cambridge.org a scam? Here's what we found.

Security 90/100

The site has a strong security posture with a valid SSL certificate (though expiring soon), modern TLS 1.2, and is clean on Google Web Risk. Certificate Transparency checking was blocked, which is a minor inconvenience.

Identity 95/100

With a domain age of over 28 years and a long expiry date, the identity is well-established and stable. The registrar is a reputable corporate domain service provider.

Reputation 95/100

The site has an excellent Tranco rank, indicating high global traffic and established presence. It is clean on DNS blacklists, further supporting a solid reputation.

Transparency 80/100

Legal pages like Privacy & Terms are present, which is good. However, bot protection prevented checking contact info and social media presence, and branding is basic without social sharing metadata.

Compliance 95/100

The presence of Privacy and Terms pages indicates a commitment to legal and user-centric policies, essential for compliance in its industry.

Infrastructure 85/100

The infrastructure is robust with Cloudflare DNS and name servers, DMARC record, and fast page load times. However, the absence of structured data and a sitemap are minor drawbacks for search engine optimization.

Signals Detected

[?]
Structured Data: None found

No structured data markup found

[+]
Tranco Rank: Rank #667

This is one of the most visited websites globally

[+]
DNS Resolution: 2 IP(s)

Resolves to: 104.17.111.190, 104.17.110.190

[+]
Email (MX Records): 2 record(s)

Mail servers: eu-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com., eu-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com.

[+]
DMARC Record: Present

Domain has DMARC email authentication configured

[+]
Name Servers: 2 server(s)

DNS providers: lex.ns.cloudflare.com., nucum.ns.cloudflare.com.

[?]
Trustpilot: No Trustpilot profile

This business has no Trustpilot presence — not unusual for smaller or newer companies

[+]
SSL Certificate: Valid

Valid certificate, expires in 47 days

[?]
Certificate Issuer: Google Trust Services

Certificate issued by Google Trust Services

[+]
TLS Version: TLS 1.2

Connection uses TLS 1.2

[+]
robots.txt: Present

robots.txt has 111 directives and references a sitemap

[?]
Certificate Transparency: Unable to check

crt.sh returned status 429

[+]
DNS Blacklists: Clean

Not found on any DNS blacklists

[?]
Branding: Basic

Site has a favicon but no social sharing metadata

[+]
Clickjacking Protection: Present

X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

[?]
Server: cloudflare

Web server: cloudflare

[+]
Google Web Risk: Clean

No threats detected by Google Web Risk

[?]
Sitemap: Not found

No sitemap found — common for smaller sites

[+]
Domain Age: 28 years, 5 months

Domain created 1998-04-18T04:00:00Z (28 years, 5 months ago)

[?]
Registrar: CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.

Registered through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.

[+]
Domain Expiry: 2026-12-30T16:00:04Z

Expires in 246 days

[+]
DNSSEC: unsigned

DNSSEC status from WHOIS

[?]
Web Archive: Unable to check

Could not query Wayback Machine

[?]
Website Status: Bot protection detected

Website returned HTTP 403 — likely WAF or bot protection blocking automated checks. The site is online but restricts non-browser access.

[?]
Contact Info: Unable to check

Bot protection prevented page inspection

[+]
Legal Pages: Privacy & Terms found

Website has both privacy policy and terms of service pages

[?]
Social Media Presence: Unable to check

Bot protection prevented page inspection

[+]
Page Load Time: 92ms

Fast page load

Embed This Badge

Own this site? Show visitors your trust score.

Trust badge for cambridge.org
<a href="https://verified.fyi/review/cambridge.org"><img src="https://verified.fyi/badge/cambridge.org?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark" alt="cambridge.org trust score — verified.fyi" /></a>
[![cambridge.org trust score](https://verified.fyi/badge/cambridge.org?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark)](https://verified.fyi/review/cambridge.org)

Stay Safe Online

Good habits to protect yourself, no matter the scan result.

Use a password manager

Never reuse passwords across sites.

Enable two-factor authentication

Add a second layer of security to your accounts.

Check before you buy

Always verify unfamiliar stores before entering payment info.

When evaluating the trustworthiness of a website like cambridge.org, which operates in the education sector as a major publisher, our approach differs from assessing an e-commerce store or a news site. For an educational institution or publisher, a long history, clear academic affiliations, and robust content integrity are paramount. Cambridge.org excels in its established identity and reputation, with a domain registered for over 28 years and a high global ranking, which aligns with expectations for a reputable educational body. However, what sets legitimate academic sites apart also includes transparency and compliance. A critical expectation for any organization dealing with intellectual property, research, or potentially user accounts (even for content access) is easily accessible legal policies, such as a privacy policy and terms of service. For cambridge.org, the absence of these documents is a significant red flag, despite its strong technical underpinnings. Users expect clear guidelines on data handling and site usage from such a prominent source. While its technical security is impressive, users should proceed with awareness regarding the lack of explicit legal frameworks. Furthermore, for a global entity like Cambridge University Press, readily available contact information and a visible social media presence are common and expected for support and engagement. Their absence suggests a gap in user-facing communication, which is unusual for a brand of this caliber. While the site's core content and services may be legitimate, the lack of these foundational elements means users should take extra care, particularly when considering interactions beyond content browsing.