Homeβ€Ί Portfolioβ€Ί en.andros.dev
Use Caution

Not sure β€” double-check en.andros.dev first

50/ 100 trust score
Industry: Portfolio Checked Jun 25, 2026 Portfolio average: 73 30 signals

In plain English

There's nothing malicious about en.andros.dev, but there's also very little evidence to go on. It's a personal portfolio site that's either brand new or has flown under the radar completely, with no history in web archives and no verifiable ownership. That doesn't make it dangerous, but it does mean you're trusting a stranger's self-description without any outside confirmation.

Cross-referenced 30 live signals from Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, WHOIS and more on Jun 25, 2026. How we score β†’

Where the score comes from

We look at six areas. Here's how en.andros.dev did in each.
85
Security

Solid security setup: modern encryption with a valid certificate, clickjacking protection enabled, and the site passes Google's threat checks. This is what you'd expect from a well-maintained personal site.

35
Identity

WHOIS data is unavailable due to a lookup failure, so ownership is unverifiable. For a personal blog or portfolio, anonymity isn't disqualifying, but it does mean you can't independently confirm who runs the site.

50
Reputation

The site is clean on blacklists and has no malware flags, but it has zero presence in the Wayback Machine and no Tranco ranking. This points to a very new or obscure site with no track record to judge by.

70
Transparency

The site has contact information and a clear description of who the person is and what they do. But there's no 'About' page beyond the homepage blurb, no social media links, and no team or company details. For a personal portfolio, this level of openness is acceptable.

75
Compliance

This is a personal site, not a business selling goods or handling payments. A missing privacy policy or terms of service is perfectly normal for a portfolio and blog. No compliance red flags here.

70
Infrastructure

Fast load times, a clean DNS setup, and no blacklist issues. The site doesn't handle email and lacks DNSSEC, but for a static personal site that's not a concern. The sitemap misconfiguration is a minor technical quibble.

What we checked

The 30 signals behind this report.
Security & Transport
Certificate Issuer
Let's Encrypt
Clickjacking Protection
Present
Google Web Risk
Clean
SSL Certificate
Valid
Security Headers
3 of 6
Server
nginx/1.26.3
TLS Version
TLS 1.3
Identity & WHOIS
About Page
Not found
Branding
Complete
Business Disclosure
Not found
Contact Info
Found
Legal Pages
Partial
WHOIS
Unable to check
Infrastructure & DNS
DNS Blacklists
Clean
DNS Resolution
1 IP(s)
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Email (MX Records)
None
Page Load Time
155ms
Reputation & Reach
Page Description
Product Owner and Full-stack developer with experience in web technologies. Passionate about functional programming, wri...
Page Heading
AndrosFenollosa
Page Language
en
Page Title
Andros Fenollosa
Sitemap
Misconfigured
Social Media Presence
None found
Structured Data
None found
Tranco Rank
Not ranked
Trustpilot
No Trustpilot profile
Web Archive History
No archive found
Website Status
Online
robots.txt
Present

Run this site? Show your score.

Add a trust badge so visitors can see your live score for themselves.

Get your badge β†’
verified.fyi
en.andros.dev
50
N Partner pick
Better safe than sorry. Stay covered everywhere: NordVPN's Threat Protection blocks known scam sites before they load.
Try NordVPN β†’

When you land on en.andros.dev, you see a clean portfolio site for a developer named Andros Fenollosa. The page describes a full-stack engineer with experience at big companies, a passion for functional programming, and a history of writing books and courses. All of that is plausible, but the site itself offers very little outside verification.

There's no web archive history, no social media links on the page, and the WHOIS ownership data is unreadable due to a lookup failure. So while the site is technically well put together β€” fast loading, properly encrypted, and free of malware β€” you're essentially taking the person's word for who they are. For a portfolio or blog, that's not unusual, but it does mean 'is en.andros.dev fake' isn't a question the data fully answers.

If you're considering hiring this person or buying one of their courses, the safest step is to cross-reference the name and claims on professional networks like LinkedIn or GitHub. A legitimate developer with the experience described should have a larger digital footprint elsewhere. The site itself isn't a scam, but it's also not a complete picture on its own.

More Portfolio sites

How similar sites score. See all β†’