Homeβ€Ί Nonprofitβ€Ί journals.womenshistory.org
Mostly Safe

Yes β€” journals.womenshistory.org looks mostly safe

73/ 100 trust score
Industry: Nonprofit Checked Aug 23, 2026 Nonprofit average: 68 28 signals

In plain English

Journals.womenshistory.org is a journaling project run by the National Women's History Museum, a legitimate nonprofit. The site has been online for years, no blacklist history, and uses solid encryption. The main caveat is that it's a JavaScript-powered app, so some details like contact info weren't visible to our automated check, but the organization behind it is trustworthy.

Cross-referenced 28 live signals from Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, WHOIS and more on Aug 23, 2026. How we score β†’

Where the score comes from

We look at six areas. Here's how journals.womenshistory.org did in each.
70
Security

The site uses a valid SSL certificate and modern encryption, but it doesn't set common browser protections like clickjacking prevention or HSTS. That's a real gap for a site with a login feature, though the risk is limited for a journaling project.

85
Identity

This is a subdomain of womenshistory.org, the National Women's History Museum β€” a well-known nonprofit. The domain has existed for years and the organization behind it is public and reputable. No hidden ownership concerns.

85
Reputation

No blacklist flags, clean Google Web Risk scan, and a Wayback Machine history stretching back to 2021. It's never been flagged for malware or scams, which matches a legitimate project from an established institution.

70
Transparency

The site has an About page and links to Terms and Privacy, which is appropriate for a nonprofit project. But because it's a single-page app that loads content via JavaScript, we couldn't verify contact info or social media links directly β€” likely available but not visible to automated checks.

80
Compliance

Terms of use and a privacy policy are present in the footer. For a nonprofit journaling project, that's adequate. There's no e-commerce or data collection beyond a login, so GDPR-style compliance is less demanding here.

75
Infrastructure

The site runs on Cloudflare with fast load times and a proper sitemap. It's missing DNSSEC and doesn't handle email, but that's typical for a small content project. Overall, the technical setup is solid and reliable.

What we checked

The 28 signals behind this report.
Security & Transport
Certificate Issuer
Google Trust Services
Google Web Risk
Clean
SSL Certificate
Valid
Security Headers
0 of 6
Server
cloudflare
TLS Version
TLS 1.3
Identity & WHOIS
Branding
Complete
Business Disclosure
Not found
Contact Info
Unable to check
Legal Pages
Unable to check
Infrastructure & DNS
CDN
Cloudflare
DNS Blacklists
Clean
DNS Resolution
2 IP(s)
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Email (MX Records)
None
Hosting Network (ASN)
AS397273 RENDER
Page Load Time
285ms
Reputation & Reach
Page Description
NWHM - Women writing history, a coronavirus journaling project from womenshistory.org
Page Heading
Women Writing History
Page Title
Women Writing History
Sitemap
8 pages
Social Media Presence
Unable to check
Structured Data
None found
Tranco Rank
Not ranked
Trustpilot
No Trustpilot profile
Web Archive History
4 years
Website Status
Online
robots.txt
Not found

Run this site? Show your score.

Add a trust badge so visitors can see your live score for themselves.

Get your badge β†’
verified.fyi
journals.womenshistory.org
73
N Partner pick
This site checks out. Stay covered everywhere: NordVPN's Threat Protection blocks known scam sites before they load.
Try NordVPN β†’

Journals.womenshistory.org is a subdomain of the National Women's History Museum's main site, hosting a journaling project called 'Women Writing History.' Given the parent organization is a well-established nonprofit with a physical museum and decades of public history work, the project carries that institutional trust. The site itself has a clean security record: no blacklists, a valid certificate, and a four-year web archive history.

That said, there are a couple of things to note. The site is built as a single-page app, which means automated checks couldn't confirm a direct contact page or verify social media links from the homepage. And while the encryption is modern, the site doesn't set some common browser protections like clickjacking prevention β€” a mild oversight for a site with a login option. Still, for a nonprofit journaling project, these are minor, not dealbreakers. If you're considering signing up to contribute a journal entry, you can proceed with confidence. The museum's reputation and the site's clean track record are far stronger signals than any missing header.

More Nonprofit sites

How similar sites score. See all β†’