mamba.vodtkcache.p2p.haplat.net looks like an infrastructure hostname. That changes the questions that matter. A consumer review of a store doesn't help here. What matters is whether the technical setup is trustworthy enough to route traffic through.
Legitimate cache and delivery endpoints usually have a valid certificate tied to the exact hostname, a visible network operator, and stable behavior over time. This one doesn't meet that standard. It sends visitors to an entirely different registrable domain instead of serving content, and there's no public footprint to show who's behind it. Those signals point the same way: proceed with caution.
The host isn't currently flagged by the usual threat checks, which is worth acknowledging. But a clean bill of health doesn't replace the basics of verified ownership and valid encryption. If you came across this host while using an app or service, ask why the app is sending traffic to a cache with no verifiable operator.