nltimes.nl presents itself as a news outlet covering the Netherlands in English. The domain is 13 years old and it runs on modern infrastructure, which are positive signs for a legitimate site. But when we dug deeper, several red flags stood out. There’s no obvious about page, no favicon, and the site blocks automated checks so we couldn’t find contact details or legal pages like a privacy policy. For a news site that likely serves European readers, missing a GDPR privacy policy is a real concern. The Wayback Machine also has no saved snapshots of the site, which is odd for a domain that’s been registered since 2013. That could mean the site deliberately blocks archiving or hasn’t always been active. While nothing here screams scam, you should treat nltimes.nl with caution. Read a few articles and see if they cite sources properly. If you’re trying to decide if nltimes.nl is fake, the lack of transparency means you shouldn’t rely on it as a primary news source without verification.
In plain English
nltimes.nl is likely a real news site given its long domain history and solid technical setup, but several transparency gaps make it hard to fully recommend without caveats. The missing about page, lack of Wayback archive, and unclear legal pages are unusual for a site that’s been around since 2013. If you visit, cross-check breaking stories with other outlets and look for an 'About' page that might be hidden behind bot protection.
Where the score comes from
Solid security for a news site: modern encryption, strong browser protections, and a clean safety record. The only ding is that the server still accepts older, deprecated encryption standards.
The domain has been around for over 13 years, which is a good sign. But there’s no clear about page or team information, and DNSSEC is off. For a news outlet, it’s not unusual to be somewhat anonymous, but a little more openness would help.
The site isn’t blacklisted and gets decent traffic, but the Wayback Machine has no archives for a 13-year-old domain. That’s strange and could mean the site has blocked archiving or hasn’t been consistently online. Also no external reviews on Trustpilot.
This is the weakest area. There’s no favicon, no about page, and the contact page couldn’t be checked due to bot protection. For a news site, readers expect basic info like who runs it and how to reach them. The lack of these signals raises questions.
As a .nl site targeting a European audience, it should have a privacy policy and cookie consent. Our checks couldn’t find either, and automated scans were blocked. That’s a real gap for GDPR requirements.
Well set up technically: fast load times, good email authentication, and a CDN. DNSSEC isn’t enabled, but that’s common. Nothing to worry about here.
What we checked
Run this site? Show your score.
Add a trust badge so visitors can see your live score for themselves.
Get your badge →