Proc-cli.com presents itself as a semantic CLI tool for killing processes by port, name, or PID. The homepage looks like a polished open-source project with version numbers and package manager links. But the domain was created just yesterday, and there's no way to reach the developer, no social media accounts, and no public identity behind the project. Legitimate command-line tools almost always have an established GitHub presence, a personal website from the maintainer, or at minimum a visible email address for bug reports. Here, none of that exists. The registration is privacy-shielded, which isn't suspicious on its own but becomes concerning when combined with a one-day-old domain and zero contact channels. If you're considering running this tool on your machine, the safest move is to wait. Let the domain age, let other developers review the code, and only install something that comes with a visible track record and clear accountability. Right now, there's not enough information to know whether proc-cli.com is a scam, a hobby project someone rushed live, or something more dangerous, but the signals point toward staying away.
In plain English
I wouldn't trust this site with my time or my terminal. Brand-new domain, no contact info, and no identifiable owner behind what claims to be a process management tool. A legitimate open-source CLI would at minimum link to a GitHub profile or blog, not just a day-old anonymous registration.
What you should do now
Don't panic. These steps limit the damage, and the sooner you take them the better.
Don't enter any details
No passwords, card numbers or personal information — even if the site looks professional.
Close the tab
Especially if you got here from an email, text message or social media ad.
Already paid? Call your bank
Contact your bank or card provider right away. They can often stop or reverse a recent payment.
Warn others
Report the site and share this check with anyone who sent you the link.
Where the score comes from
Legitimate encryption setup with a valid certificate and fast delivery through Fastly's edge network, but it lacks browser-level protections against clickjacking and other common web attacks.
The domain is only one day old, registered anonymously through a privacy service. No real-world identity or business presence is visible behind the site.
No blacklist history, but the domain is too fresh to have any meaningful reputation. A single Hacker News mention in 2026 is the only external signal, and nothing exists in the Wayback Machine from before today.
There's no contact page, no email, no phone number, and no social media links. The about page exists but doesn't name individuals or explain who runs the project. A legitimate open-source tool would typically link to a GitHub profile or a personal site.
As a downloadable software tool, a privacy policy and terms of service are expected but missing. That's not unusual for a very early-stage project, but it means users have no legal recourse or data handling commitments.
Hosted on Fastly with good email authentication and multiple DNS records. The site loads quickly and uses modern technology. DNSSEC is missing, but that's common for small sites.
What we checked
Think this verdict is wrong?
Site owners can request a fresh scan. Scores update automatically as signals change.