raghugangamun.gov.np review: Is this Nepal government site safe?

No — raghugangamun.gov.np doesn't look safe

30/ 100 trust score

Industry: Government Checked Jun 18, 2026 Government average: 72 18 signals

What you should do now

Don't panic. These steps limit the damage, and the sooner you take them the better.

Don't enter any details

No passwords, card numbers or personal information — even if the site looks professional.

Close the tab

Especially if you got here from an email, text message or social media ad.

Already paid? Call your bank

Contact your bank or card provider right away. They can often stop or reverse a recent payment.

Warn others

Report the site and share this check with anyone who sent you the link.

Where the score comes from

We look at six areas. Here's how raghugangamun.gov.np did in each.

Security

No HTTPS is a serious red flag. Any site with a .gov.np domain should have basic encryption, especially if it handles any kind of inquiry or data. The site also timed out under probe, but the lack of SSL is the real concern here.

Identity

The domain is a .gov.np address, which is tied to Nepal's government network. WHOIS is not publicly accessible for this TLD, which is normal for government domains. The domain has been around for 8 years, which adds some confidence that it's an established government entity.

Reputation

No blacklist hits and 8 years of web archive history suggest a clean past. The site is not heavily visited, but that's normal for a local government resource. No negative signals in the archive either.

Transparency

The site has no favicon and minimal online presence. For a government website, you'd typically expect some form of contact or about page, though the archive snapshot may not capture everything. The lack of social media is not unusual for a small municipal government site.

Compliance

Government websites in Nepal are not typically subject to the same privacy policy and cookie consent requirements as commercial sites. The absence of these pages is not a compliance failure in this context.

Infrastructure

DNS is configured with government name servers and email authentication is in place, which adds legitimacy. But the lack of email handling (no MX records) and missing HTTPS are weak points for any functional website.

What we checked

The 18 signals behind this report.

Security & Transport

Google Web Risk

Clean

SSL/TLS

No HTTPS

Site Reachable

Connection timed out

Identity & WHOIS

Branding

Missing

whois

check failed

Infrastructure & DNS

DMARC Record

p=quarantine

DNS Blacklists

Clean

DNS Resolution

1 IP(s)

DNSSEC

Not enabled

Email (MX Records)

None

Name Servers

3 server(s)

SPF Record

Present

Reputation & Reach

Sitemap

Not found

Tranco Rank

Not ranked

Trustpilot

No Trustpilot profile

Web Archive History

8 years

Website

Connection timed out

robots.txt

Not found

When you see a .gov.np domain, there's an expectation of official government status and basic security. raghugangamun.gov.np has the hallmarks of a real Nepal government entity: it's been registered for 8 years, uses official Nepal IT Center name servers, and has never shown up on any blacklists. That part checks out.

But here's where things get concerning. The site does not support HTTPS encryption. For any government website that might accept inquiries, forms, or even just serve information to citizens, that's a serious shortcoming. Without encryption, someone on the same network could see or modify what you're reading or submitting. The site also didn't respond to our connection probe, which could mean it's running behind aggressive bot protection or is simply not well maintained.

If you need to interact with this website, treat it with caution. Do not submit any personal information unless you see the padlock icon in your browser address bar and the URL starts with https://. If you're trying to reach an official government office in Nepal, consider alternative channels like phone or email until this site gets its security sorted. The domain appears legitimate, but the technical gaps make it risky to use for anything sensitive right now.