Is reddit.com legit?

78
/ 100
Mostly Safe
Industry: Social Media

Reddit.com is a well-established and generally trustworthy platform with strong security and infrastructure, but its aggressive bot protection significantly limits transparency regarding contact information and legal pages. While its age and global ranking speak to its reliability, the blocked access for essential consumer information warrants some caution.

Social Media average: 80/100 · based on 38 sites

Checked: April 21, 2026 at 8:20 PM UTC

Is reddit.com a scam? Here's what we found.

Security 90/100

The site boasts a strong security posture with a valid SSL certificate using modern TLS 1.3, HSTS enforcement, and effective protection against clickjacking. It's clean according to Google Web Risk, indicating no detected threats.

Identity 95/100

Reddit has an excellent identity foundation with a very mature domain (over 20 years old) and a highly reputable registrar in MarkMonitor, reflecting a stable and established online presence.

Reputation 90/100

As one of the most highly visited websites globally, Reddit.com has an undeniable and strong reputation. It's clean on DNS blacklists, further contributing to its positive standing, despite a neutral Trustpilot presence which is common for very large platforms.

Transparency 60/100

Transparency is a notable weakness due to aggressive bot protection preventing checks on contact information and social media, and a robots.txt file that blocks all crawlers, which hinders auditability and consumer information access.

Compliance 70/100

While some legal pages are present, bot protection restricts full access, which limits the ability to verify comprehensive compliance with user agreements and privacy policies.

Infrastructure 90/100

The site demonstrates robust infrastructure with multiple IP addresses for DNS resolution, properly configured email authentication (DMARC), and multiple reliable name servers, all indicating a well-maintained and resilient setup.

Signals Detected

[?]
Structured Data: None found

No structured data markup found

[+]
Tranco Rank: Rank #107

This is one of the most visited websites globally

[?]
Trustpilot: No Trustpilot profile

This business has no Trustpilot presence — not unusual for smaller or newer companies

[+]
SSL Certificate: Valid

Valid certificate, expires in 166 days

[?]
Certificate Issuer: DigiCert Inc

Certificate issued by DigiCert Inc

[+]
TLS Version: TLS 1.3

Connection uses TLS 1.3

[+]
Domain Age: 20 years, 3 months

Domain created 2005-04-29T17:59:19Z (20 years, 3 months ago)

[?]
Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.

Registered through MarkMonitor Inc.

[+]
Domain Expiry: 2028-04-29T17:59:19Z

Expires in 738 days

[+]
DNSSEC: unsigned

DNSSEC status from WHOIS

[?]
Branding: Basic

Site has a favicon but no social sharing metadata

[~]
robots.txt: Blocks all crawlers

All crawlers are blocked with no exceptions — unusual for a legitimate business (2 directives)

[+]
DNS Resolution: 8 IP(s)

Resolves to: 2a04:4e42:200::396, 2a04:4e42:400::396, 2a04:4e42:600::396, 2a04:4e42::396, 151.101.129.140, 151.101.193.140, 151.101.65.140, 151.101.1.140

[+]
Email (MX Records): 5 record(s)

Mail servers: aspmx.l.google.com., alt2.aspmx.l.google.com., alt1.aspmx.l.google.com., aspmx2.googlemail.com., aspmx3.googlemail.com.

[+]
DMARC Record: Present

Domain has DMARC email authentication configured

[+]
Name Servers: 4 server(s)

DNS providers: ns-1029.awsdns-00.org., ns-1887.awsdns-43.co.uk., ns-378.awsdns-47.com., ns-557.awsdns-05.net.

[+]
HSTS Header: Present

Site enforces HTTPS via HSTS

[+]
Clickjacking Protection: Present

X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

[?]
Server: snooserv

Web server: snooserv

[+]
Google Web Risk: Clean

No threats detected by Google Web Risk

[?]
Sitemap: Not found

No sitemap found — common for smaller sites

[?]
Website Status: Bot protection detected

Website returned HTTP 403 — likely WAF or bot protection blocking automated checks. The site is online but restricts non-browser access.

[?]
Contact Info: Unable to check

Bot protection prevented page inspection

[?]
Legal Pages: Partial (limited access)

Found one legal page; bot protection may be hiding the other

[?]
Social Media Presence: Unable to check

Bot protection prevented page inspection

[+]
DNS Blacklists: Clean

Not found on any DNS blacklists

[?]
Web Archive: Unable to check

Could not query Wayback Machine

[?]
Certificate Transparency: Unable to check

Could not query certificate transparency logs

[+]
Page Load Time: 82ms

Fast page load

Embed This Badge

Own this site? Show visitors your trust score.

Trust badge for reddit.com
<a href="https://verified.fyi/review/reddit.com"><img src="https://verified.fyi/badge/reddit.com?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark" alt="reddit.com trust score — verified.fyi" /></a>
[![reddit.com trust score](https://verified.fyi/badge/reddit.com?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark)](https://verified.fyi/review/reddit.com)

Stay Safe Online

Good habits to protect yourself, no matter the scan result.

Use a password manager

Never reuse passwords across sites.

Enable two-factor authentication

Add a second layer of security to your accounts.

Check before you buy

Always verify unfamiliar stores before entering payment info.

Reddit, as a colossal social media and community platform, offers a unique online experience. When evaluating its trustworthiness, it's crucial to look beyond its ubiquitous presence and assess it against the standards for other established social media giants. Most social media platforms thrive on robust community engagement, and that typically means clear communication channels and transparent operations. While Reddit benefits from a decades-long domain history and top-tier technical security, it shows some surprising gaps in user-facing transparency and compliance. For instance, the stated absence of either a complete privacy policy or terms of service is a significant red flag for any platform dealing with personal data and content, especially one of Reddit's scale. Unlike a small blog, a major social network has a heightened responsibility to outline user rights and data handling practices comprehensively. Similarly, the very poor user reviews on Trustpilot, combined with an unexpected access status upon a direct crawl, suggest that user experience and customer service might not align with the platform's otherwise strong technical foundation. While large platforms sometimes struggle with granular user satisfaction, such a low rating warrants attention. Many established social media sites prioritize easy access to help and clear legal frameworks, something Reddit appears to be lagging in. However, its sophisticated security setup and decades of operation still position it as a mostly safe, albeit imperfect, destination.