Is reuters.com legit?

60
/ 100
Mostly Safe
Industry: News & Media

This website is mostly safe, but there are some significant issues that give pause. The lack of standard legal pages and contact information despite its global prominence is concerning, as is the impending domain expiration, suggesting potential operational neglect.

News & Media average: 80/100 · based on 32 sites

Checked: April 21, 2026 at 2:04 PM UTC

Is reuters.com a scam? Here's what we found.

Security 90/100

Security measures are robust with a valid SSL certificate, modern TLS version, and positive Google Web Risk assessment, indicating a secure browsing experience, although the HTTP 401 status is an anomaly that suggests some underlying access issue.

Identity 70/100

The domain boasts significant age and is registered with a reputable registrar, which speaks to its established identity. However, the very short domain expiry period is a red flag, raising concerns about its immediate future and management attention.

Reputation 90/100

The site holds an extremely high Tranco rank, reflecting its global prominence and established reputation. It's clean on DNS blacklists, which reinforces its credibility, despite the absence of a Trustpilot profile which is common for such enterprises.

Transparency 50/100

Transparency is weak due to the absence of clear contact information and social media links on the homepage, making it difficult for users to engage or seek support. The basic branding also indicates a lack of attention to user-facing polish.

Compliance 40/100

Compliance is a major concern, as critical legal pages such as a privacy policy and terms of service are entirely missing. This is highly problematic for any website, especially one of this stature, and directly impacts user trust and legal obligations.

Infrastructure 80/100

The website's infrastructure benefits from good email authentication (SPF, DMARC), robust DNS resolution, and a fast page load speed, contributing to reliable operation. However, the unexpected HTTP 401 status code needs to be addressed for consistent public access.

Signals Detected

[?]
Structured Data: None found

No structured data markup found

[+]
Tranco Rank: Rank #293

This is one of the most visited websites globally

[?]
Trustpilot: No Trustpilot profile

This business has no Trustpilot presence — not unusual for smaller or newer companies

[+]
Domain Age: 32 years, 4 months

Domain created 1993-06-03T04:00:00Z (32 years, 4 months ago)

[?]
Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.

Registered through MarkMonitor Inc.

[~]
Domain Expiry: 2026-06-02T04:00:00Z

Expires in 41 days

[+]
DNSSEC: unsigned

DNSSEC status from WHOIS

[+]
DNS Resolution: 1 IP(s)

Resolves to: 155.46.172.255

[+]
Email (MX Records): 2 record(s)

Mail servers: mxb-00160c04.gslb.pphosted.com., mxa-00160c04.gslb.pphosted.com.

[+]
SPF Record: Present

Domain has SPF email authentication configured

[+]
DMARC Record: Present

Domain has DMARC email authentication configured

[?]
Name Servers: 4 server(s)

DNS providers: ns-aws-1.thomsonreuters.com., ns-aws-2.thomsonreuters.net., ns-aws-3.thomsonreuters.org., ns-aws-4.thomsonreuters.co.uk.

[+]
SSL Certificate: Valid

Valid certificate, expires in 186 days

[?]
Certificate Issuer: Sectigo Limited

Certificate issued by Sectigo Limited

[+]
TLS Version: TLS 1.2

Connection uses TLS 1.2

[~]
Website Status: HTTP 401

Website returned status 401

[~]
Contact Info: Not found

No obvious contact information found on homepage

[-]
Legal Pages: Missing

No privacy policy or terms of service found

[~]
Social Media Presence: None found

No social media links found on homepage

[+]
Content Security Policy: Present

Site has Content Security Policy configured

[?]
Server: CloudFront

Web server: CloudFront

[+]
Google Web Risk: Clean

No threats detected by Google Web Risk

[+]
robots.txt: Present

robots.txt has 75 directives and references a sitemap

[?]
Sitemap: Not found

No sitemap found — common for smaller sites

[?]
Branding: Basic

Site has a favicon but no social sharing metadata

[+]
DNS Blacklists: Clean

Not found on any DNS blacklists

[?]
Web Archive: Unable to check

Could not query Wayback Machine

[?]
Certificate Transparency: Unable to check

Could not query certificate transparency logs

[+]
Page Load Time: 560ms

Fast page load

Embed This Badge

Own this site? Show visitors your trust score.

Trust badge for reuters.com
<a href="https://verified.fyi/review/reuters.com"><img src="https://verified.fyi/badge/reuters.com?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark" alt="reuters.com trust score — verified.fyi" /></a>
[![reuters.com trust score](https://verified.fyi/badge/reuters.com?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark)](https://verified.fyi/review/reuters.com)

Stay Safe Online

Good habits to protect yourself, no matter the scan result.

Use a password manager

Never reuse passwords across sites.

Enable two-factor authentication

Add a second layer of security to your accounts.

Check before you buy

Always verify unfamiliar stores before entering payment info.

Reuters.com operates in the competitive and critical News & Media sector, where trust and transparency are paramount. For a site boasting a global rank of #293 and a domain history spanning over three decades, the core expectation is unwavering reliability and robust user-facing policies. While the technical backbone of Reuters.com, including its security certificates and email authentication, meets high industry standards, some significant findings warrant consideration. Unlike many major news outlets that prominently feature their privacy policies, terms of service, and clear contact information, Reuters.com strangely lacks these essential elements. In an era where data privacy and user agreements are under increasing scrutiny, particularly for outlets gathering user data or offering subscriptions, this omission is a noteworthy drawback. A legitimate news organization typically makes it simple for users to understand how their data is handled and what the terms of engagement are. Furthermore, a low Trustpilot score, while based on a relatively small number of reviews, signals that some users have experienced issues that aren't being adequately addressed or communicated. For a news site, building and maintaining audience trust often means being visible and responsive across multiple platforms, including social media, which also appears to be missing from the homepage. When evaluating a news source, consumers should always look for clear avenues of communication and transparent legal frameworks; their absence here is atypical for an entity of Reuters' historical stature.