Homeβ€Ί Entertainmentβ€Ί silo.fandom.com
Mostly Safe

Yes β€” silo.fandom.com looks mostly safe

73/ 100 trust score
Industry: Entertainment Checked Sep 4, 2026 Entertainment average: 57 33 signals
Check another site

In plain English

silo.fandom.com looks like a legitimate fan wiki for the TV series Silo, and the technical checks support that. Its Cloudflare challenge kept me from viewing page content directly, so I can't vouch for the articles themselves. No scam signals emerged, though the wiki's lack of archive history means it may be newer than it appears.

Cross-referenced 33 live signals from Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, WHOIS and more on Sep 4, 2026. How we score β†’

Where the score comes from

We look at six areas. Here's how silo.fandom.com did in each.
80
Security

A valid certificate, strong security headers, and clean threat checks point to a well-configured site. Accepting outdated encryption protocols is a minor weakness, not something a visitor needs to worry about.

75
Identity

The site sits on Fandom's infrastructure, which explains the missing standalone WHOIS and makes ownership questions less relevant. On a fan wiki, having no named individual behind it is the norm.

70
Reputation

Nothing in abuse databases or search-engine threat lists suggests this URL is being used for harm. The lack of an archive snapshot likely means the wiki is new or rarely crawled, and that alone is not evidence of a problem.

70
Transparency

There isn't a dedicated about page or contact list, which is typical for fan projects and not a sign of deception. Cloudflare's challenge page blocked a deeper look, so we're left with incomplete rather than suspicious information.

75
Compliance

Legal documents are normally absent on hobbyist wikis, and there are no payments or account forms to worry about here. If this ever added user logins beyond standard Fandom accounts, the platform's own policies would apply.

78
Infrastructure

A fast, well-hosted setup with clean mail routes and a major content delivery network. The lack of domain signing is a common subdomain gap and doesn't worry me.

What we checked

The 33 signals behind this report.
Security & Transport
Certificate Issuer
Google Trust Services
Content Security Policy
Present
Google Web Risk
Clean
HSTS Header
Present
Legacy TLS
Accepted
SSL Certificate
Valid
Security Headers
6 of 6
Server
cloudflare
TLS Version
TLS 1.3
Identity & WHOIS
About Page
Not found
Branding
Missing
Business Disclosure
Not found
Contact Info
Unable to check
Legal Pages
Unable to check
Infrastructure & DNS
CAA Record
9 issuer(s)
CDN
Cloudflare
DNS Blacklists
Clean
DNS Resolution
2 IP(s)
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Email (MX Records)
5 record(s)
Hosting Network (ASN)
AS13335 CLOUDFLARENET
Name Servers
3 server(s)
Page Load Time
100ms
Reputation & Reach
Page Language
en-US
Page Title
Just a moment...
Sitemap
Not found
Social Media Presence
Unable to check
Structured Data
None found
Tranco Rank
Not ranked
Trustpilot
No Trustpilot profile
Web Archive History
No archive found
Website Status
Bot protection detected
robots.txt
Not found

Run this site? Show your score.

Add a trust badge so visitors can see your live score for themselves.

Get your badge β†’
verified.fyi
silo.fandom.com
73
N Partner pick
This site checks out. Stay covered everywhere: NordVPN's Threat Protection blocks known scam sites before they load.
Try NordVPN β†’

silo.fandom.com is a fan wiki for the Apple TV series Silo, built on Fandom's well-known platform. That context matters. This isn't an unknown store or a service asking for personal details, it's a fan-run encyclopedia. For that kind of site, the absence of a company page, legal documents, and contact forms is normal.

The technical side is clean. There are no blacklist hits or threat warnings, the connection is properly encrypted, and the domain sits on a major CDN. The main thing I couldn't do was read the actual pages, because Cloudflare's bot check blocks automated access. That's a limitation, not a red flag.

If you're wondering "is silo.fandom.com a scam," there's no evidence to suggest it is. What would make a fan wiki untrustworthy is fake or misleading content, so check the article history and community discussions before treating any specific claim as fact. As far as safety goes, this looks like standard Fandom content.

More Entertainment sites

How similar sites score. See all β†’