Home Infrastructure static-redesign.cnbcfm.com
Trusted

Yes — static-redesign.cnbcfm.com looks safe

80/ 100 trust score
Industry: Infrastructure Checked Jul 16, 2026 Infrastructure average: 47 28 signals

In plain English

This subdomain is very likely a legitimate part of a larger media company's infrastructure. It has a clean security record, a seven-year web history, and is hosted on a reputable CDN. The lack of direct ownership details is normal for a static-asset subdomain, and nothing here suggests a scam or risk.

Cross-referenced 28 live signals from Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, WHOIS and more on Jul 16, 2026. How we score →

Where the score comes from

We look at six areas. Here's how static-redesign.cnbcfm.com did in each.
90
Security

Strong security posture: a valid SSL certificate from a trusted issuer, enforced HTTPS, and modern TLS encryption. The site passes Google Web Risk and is not on any blacklists, which is exactly what you'd expect from a legitimate content delivery server.

70
Identity

The subdomain itself has no separate WHOIS record, which is normal. The parent domain has been archived for 7 years, suggesting a long-standing operation. However, we can't directly confirm who owns it, so the identity picture is incomplete but not alarming.

85
Reputation

Clean reputation signals: no blacklists, no Google Safe Browsing flags, and a Wayback Machine history stretching back to 2018. This longevity and absence of abuse reports are strong indicators of a legitimate, well-maintained asset.

80
Transparency

For a static-asset subdomain that doesn't serve a public-facing business, the lack of an about page or contact info is entirely expected. The site's purpose is to deliver files, not to explain itself, so this isn't a red flag.

80
Compliance

No privacy policy, terms, or cookie consent are present, but that's standard for a subdomain that merely hosts static files and doesn't collect user data. There's no commercial activity here that would trigger legal obligations.

80
Infrastructure

Hosted on Akamai, a major CDN, with fast response times and proper DNS resolution. The absence of email servers is fine for a delivery-only endpoint. DNSSEC isn't enabled, but that's a minor gap for this type of service.

What we checked

The 28 signals behind this report.
Security & Transport
Certificate Issuer
DigiCert Inc
Google Web Risk
Clean
HSTS Header
Present
SSL Certificate
Valid
Security Headers
1 of 6
Server
AkamaiGHost
TLS Version
TLS 1.3
Identity & WHOIS
About Page
Not found
Branding
Missing
Business Disclosure
Not found
Contact Info
Unable to check
Legal Pages
Unable to check
Infrastructure & DNS
DNS Blacklists
Clean
DNS Resolution
3 IP(s)
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Email (MX Records)
None
Hosting Network (ASN)
AS16625 AKAMAI-AS
Page Load Time
79ms
Reputation & Reach
Page Heading
Access Denied
Page Title
Access Denied
Sitemap
Not found
Social Media Presence
Unable to check
Structured Data
None found
Tranco Rank
Not ranked
Trustpilot
No Trustpilot profile
Web Archive History
7 years
Website Status
Bot protection detected
robots.txt
Not found

Run this site? Show your score.

Add a trust badge so visitors can see your live score for themselves.

Get your badge →
verified.fyi
static-redesign.cnbcfm.com
80
N Partner pick
This site checks out. Stay covered everywhere: NordVPN's Threat Protection blocks known scam sites before they load.
Try NordVPN →

Static-redesign.cnbcfm.com is a subdomain that appears to serve static files for a larger media or news-related operation. The domain has been active for at least seven years according to the Wayback Machine, and it's hosted on Akamai, a well-known content delivery network. Security is solid: the site uses HTTPS with a valid certificate and passes all major safety checks. The site itself is blocked by bot protection, which is typical for CDN endpoints that are not meant for direct browsing. There's no contact page or about section, but that's normal for a backend asset server — it's not a consumer-facing business. If you're wondering whether static-redesign.cnbcfm.com is legit, the evidence points to it being a legitimate piece of infrastructure, not a scam. The lack of direct identity verification is the only reason it's not a perfect score, but for this type of site, that's not a concern. In short, there's no reason to treat this subdomain as unsafe.

More Infrastructure sites

How similar sites score. See all →