terminal-bench-science.ai presents itself as a benchmark for evaluating AI agents in scientific research, but a closer look raises serious questions. The domain was registered just one day ago, and the owner's identity is hidden behind a privacy service. Legitimate academic projects — especially those claiming affiliation with Stanford University — typically have an about page, contact information, or at least a public-facing team. This site has none of that. There's also no privacy policy or terms of use, which is notable if the tool asks users to run benchmarks that may involve uploading data. The technical side is fine: the site loads fast, uses HTTPS, and is hosted on Vercel. But for a research tool that asks for trust, the total lack of verifiable identity and history makes it impossible to recommend using it right now. If you're considering terminal-bench-science.ai for your work, wait until the site establishes a track record and shows who is behind it.
No — terminal-bench-science.ai doesn't look safe
In plain English
This site is only a day old and hides nearly everything about who runs it, which makes it hard to trust as a legitimate research benchmark. There's no way to verify the claimed Stanford affiliation or contact anyone behind it. Until the domain matures and transparency improves, treat it with caution.
What you should do now
Don't panic. These steps limit the damage, and the sooner you take them the better.
Don't enter any details
No passwords, card numbers or personal information — even if the site looks professional.
Close the tab
Especially if you got here from an email, text message or social media ad.
Already paid? Call your bank
Contact your bank or card provider right away. They can often stop or reverse a recent payment.
Warn others
Report the site and share this check with anyone who sent you the link.
Where the score comes from
Strong encryption and a clean security record — valid SSL, enforced HTTPS, and no blacklist hits. The high number of external scripts is worth a second look but not alarming by itself.
The domain is only one day old and the owner is hidden behind a privacy service. No about page or team information exists, making it nearly impossible to know who is behind this site.
No negative reputation flags, but also no history to go on — the domain has zero web archive presence and no external reviews. It's a completely blank slate, which for a day-old site is more concerning than neutral.
There is no contact information, no about page, and no social media links. The site claims affiliation with Stanford University, but offers no way to verify that or reach the operators.
For a research project, missing privacy and terms pages is not unusual. The bigger issue is the lack of any disclosure about data handling given the site invites users to 'run' a benchmark, which could involve submitting data.
Solid technical setup: hosted on Vercel with a CDN, fast load times, and modern encryption. No email service appears configured, but that's normal for a tool that doesn't send mail.
What we checked
Think this verdict is wrong?
Site owners can request a fresh scan. Scores update automatically as signals change.