Trellner Research publishes independent reports on AI search engines—a niche but useful topic. The site itself looks professional: there's an about page, contact information, and a clear description of what it does. Security is solid with HTTPS and Cloudflare protection. So why 'Use Caution'? The domain was registered just four days ago. That's the biggest red flag here. Legitimate research outlets can start fresh, but a brand-new domain means no reputation, no track record, and no way to verify claims through history. Scammers also love new domains. For now, trellner.com appears to be what it claims: a research blog. There's no e-commerce or data collection that would raise compliance concerns. The missing privacy policy is normal for a site like this. But you should treat any information from a site this young as unverified. If you're reading their reports, double-check sources elsewhere. If they ever ask for money or personal details, pause. The site may be genuine—but it hasn't earned the benefit of the doubt yet. Keep an eye on it as it ages; if it's still around in six months with consistent output, that will be a much stronger signal.
In plain English
This site is only four days old, which makes it inherently risky even though it looks legitimate. It has many good signals—an about page, contact info, solid security—but its extreme newness means there's no history to judge it by. Approach with caution, especially if you're asked to share personal data or make a payment (though currently it appears to be a free research publication).
Where the score comes from
Strong setup: a valid certificate, modern TLS, and Cloudflare protection. No blacklist or threat warnings. This is standard for any legitimate site and well above the minimum.
The domain was registered just 4 days ago, which is the biggest risk factor. The registrant info is hidden behind NameCheap's privacy—normal for individuals but adds opacity. For a research blog, some anonymity is expected, but the extreme newness is a real concern.
The site is too new to have a track record. It's not on any blacklists and hasn't been flagged by Google, but there's no web archive history or external reviews yet. Neutral ground—neither positive nor negative.
The site has a clear About page, contact information, and links to social media. For a small research publication, this is better than most. They openly describe what they do and who they are.
No privacy policy or terms of service, but that's normal for a blog or research site that doesn't collect payments or sensitive data. No red flags here given the site type.
Good technical basics: fast load times, email authentication set up, and a CDN in place. Lacks some security headers and DNSSEC, but those are common omissions on smaller sites. No issues with reachability or DNS.
What we checked
Run this site? Show your score.
Add a trust badge so visitors can see your live score for themselves.
Get your badge →