Homeβ€Ί Infrastructureβ€Ί vizzion.com
Use Caution

Not sure β€” double-check vizzion.com first

55/ 100 trust score
Industry: Infrastructure Checked Jul 18, 2026 Infrastructure average: 48 34 signals

In plain English

Vizzion.com has been around for 26 years with a clean security record, which is reassuring. But the missing privacy policy and terms of service is a red flag for a company that handles camera data from government agencies. Approach with caution until they clarify their data handling practices.

Cross-referenced 34 live signals from Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, WHOIS and more on Jul 18, 2026. How we score β†’

Where the score comes from

We look at six areas. Here's how vizzion.com did in each.
75
Security

The site uses a valid SSL certificate and has no malware or phishing flags, which is standard for a legitimate business. However, it lacks basic browser protections like clickjacking prevention, which is a minor oversight but not a dealbreaker.

85
Identity

The domain has been registered since 1999 under a well-known registrar, and the site publishes an about page. This level of transparency is strong for a B2B data provider.

90
Reputation

Over 25 years of web archive history, clean DNS blacklists, and no negative trust signals. This is a well-established domain with a long track record.

80
Transparency

Contact information, an about page, and social media links are all present. The site communicates who they are reasonably well for a commercial service.

35
Compliance

No privacy policy or terms of service are available. For a company that collects and provides data from thousands of cameras, this is a significant gap that could affect customer trust and legal compliance.

75
Infrastructure

Email authentication is configured, DNS is stable, and the site loads quickly. Missing DNSSEC is common and not a major concern.

What we checked

The 34 signals behind this report.
Security & Transport
Certificate Issuer
DigiCert Inc
Google Web Risk
Clean
SSL Certificate
Valid
Security Headers
0 of 6
TLS Version
TLS 1.2
Identity & WHOIS
About Page
Found
Branding
Basic
Business Disclosure
Not found
Contact Info
Found
Domain Age
26 years, 0 months
Domain Expiry
2026-11-14T22:22:34Z
Legal Pages
Missing
Registrar
Network Solutions, LLC
Infrastructure & DNS
DMARC Record
p=quarantine
DNS Blacklists
Clean
DNS Resolution
1 IP(s)
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNSSEC
unsigned
Email (MX Records)
5 record(s)
Hosting Network (ASN)
AS14415 HOSTCOLLECTIVE
Name Servers
5 server(s)
Page Load Time
807ms
SPF Record
Present
Reputation & Reach
Page Description
Vizzion provides traffic camera and on-vehicle camera data and services featuring over 100,000 cameras in 30+ countries....
Page Language
en
Page Title
Vizzion: Road Imagery
Sitemap
Not found
Social Media Presence
2 platforms
Structured Data
None found
Tranco Rank
Not ranked
Trustpilot
No Trustpilot profile
Web Archive History
25 years
Website Status
Online
robots.txt
Not found

Run this site? Show your score.

Add a trust badge so visitors can see your live score for themselves.

Get your badge β†’
verified.fyi
vizzion.com
55
N Partner pick
Better safe than sorry. Stay covered everywhere: NordVPN's Threat Protection blocks known scam sites before they load.
Try NordVPN β†’

Vizzion.com is a B2B data provider offering road imagery from over 100,000 traffic cameras. The domain has been active since 1999, which is a strong sign of longevity, and our technical checks show no malware or blacklisting issues. However, for a company that aggregates data from government agencies and private organizations, the absence of a privacy policy or terms of service is unusual. Most established data services in this space make their data handling policies easy to find. If you're considering using their API, ask directly for written documentation on how they collect, store, and share camera data. Vizzion.com reviews from other users are scarce, but the lack of legal pages doesn't mean it's a scam β€” it means you should verify their compliance before signing a contract. The site's security basics are fine, but transparency around data use is where they fall short.

More Infrastructure sites

How similar sites score. See all β†’