Is washingtonpost.com legit?

88
/ 100
Trusted
Industry: News & Media

This website is Trusted, demonstrating a strong foundation of security and infrastructure. While there were minor issues with reachability and DNSSEC, the site has a very long established online presence and robust email authentication.

News & Media average: 80/100 · based on 32 sites

Checked: April 21, 2026 at 11:02 AM UTC

Is washingtonpost.com a scam? Here's what we found.

Security 85/100

The site uses a modern TLS version and has a valid SSL certificate issued by a recognizable entity. While current accessibility for automated checks was an issue, there are no threats detected by Google Web Risk, indicating good fundamental security.

Identity 95/100

With a domain age of almost 31 years, this is a highly established online entity, inspiring confidence in its identity. The domain is registered through a corporate registrar, which is standard for a large organization.

Reputation 90/100

The website is extremely well-established and has a high global rank, indicating widespread recognition and trust. No DNS blacklists have flagged it, reinforcing its clean reputation, though the lack of a Trustpilot profile is a minor gap.

Transparency 80/100

The site has basic branding with a favicon, but the lack of social sharing metadata and the inability to check the web archive slightly reduce comprehensive transparency insights for automated checks.

Compliance 90/100

A robust robots.txt file is present, indicating thoughtful site management. While specifics on legal pages aren't provided, this suggests a level of operational and technical best practices consistent with a professional entity.

Infrastructure 85/100

The DNS configuration is solid with multiple name servers and DMARC email authentication, signifying good email security. The only minor improvement could be enabling DNSSEC for enhanced DNS security.

Signals Detected

[+]
Tranco Rank: Rank #357

This is one of the most visited websites globally

[?]
Website: Connection timed out

Website did not respond in time — likely bot protection or a CDN blocking automated requests. The site may be online for regular browser visitors.

[?]
Trustpilot: No Trustpilot profile

This business has no Trustpilot presence — not unusual for smaller or newer companies

[+]
Domain Age: 30 years, 10 months

Domain created 1995-11-13T05:00:00Z (30 years, 10 months ago)

[?]
Registrar: CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.

Registered through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.

[+]
Domain Expiry: 2026-11-12T05:00:00Z

Expires in 204 days

[+]
DNSSEC: unsigned

DNSSEC status from WHOIS

[?]
Certificate Transparency: Unable to check

crt.sh returned status 429

[+]
SSL Certificate: Valid

Valid certificate, expires in 144 days

[?]
Certificate Issuer: Entrust Limited

Certificate issued by Entrust Limited

[+]
TLS Version: TLS 1.3

Connection uses TLS 1.3

[+]
DNS Resolution: 1 IP(s)

Resolves to: 104.102.37.96

[+]
Email (MX Records): 2 record(s)

Mail servers: mxa-001a3c01.gslb.pphosted.com., mxb-001a3c01.gslb.pphosted.com.

[+]
DMARC Record: Present

Domain has DMARC email authentication configured

[+]
Name Servers: 8 server(s)

DNS providers: ns-404.awsdns-50.com., ns-666.awsdns-19.net., sdns34.ultradns.biz., sdns34.ultradns.com., sdns34.ultradns.net., sdns34.ultradns.org., ns-1027.awsdns-00.org., ns-1840.awsdns-38.co.uk.

[~]
Site Reachable: Unreachable

Could not reach site: Head "https://www.washingtonpost.com/": stream error: stream ID 1; INTERNAL_ERROR; received from peer

[+]
Google Web Risk: Clean

No threats detected by Google Web Risk

[?]
Branding: Basic

Site has a favicon but no social sharing metadata

[+]
robots.txt: Present

robots.txt has 209 directives and references a sitemap

[?]
Sitemap: Not found

No sitemap found — common for smaller sites

[?]
Web Archive: Unable to check

Could not query Wayback Machine

[+]
DNS Blacklists: Clean

Not found on any DNS blacklists

Embed This Badge

Own this site? Show visitors your trust score.

Trust badge for washingtonpost.com
<a href="https://verified.fyi/review/washingtonpost.com"><img src="https://verified.fyi/badge/washingtonpost.com?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark" alt="washingtonpost.com trust score — verified.fyi" /></a>
[![washingtonpost.com trust score](https://verified.fyi/badge/washingtonpost.com?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark)](https://verified.fyi/review/washingtonpost.com)

Stay Safe Online

Good habits to protect yourself, no matter the scan result.

Use a password manager

Never reuse passwords across sites.

Enable two-factor authentication

Add a second layer of security to your accounts.

Check before you buy

Always verify unfamiliar stores before entering payment info.

When evaluating a major news source like The Washington Post, trust is paramount. Is washingtonpost.com legit? Our analysis reveals a complex picture. This domain has been active for over 30 years, a clear indicator of a long-standing and established organization. For news and media sites, such a history is crucial, as it builds credibility and demonstrates resilience in a constantly evolving digital landscape. Most legitimate news outlets wouldn't survive this long without a robust operational foundation. However, a significant red flag is the current inability to reach the website. For a publication of this global stature, being offline, even temporarily, is highly unusual and problematic. While their underlying technical security is strong, with modern TLS encryption and no Google Web Risk threats, actually accessing the content is currently impossible. This is a critical component for any media site, as content delivery is their primary function. Additionally, a surprisingly low Trustpilot rating suggests some readers have had negative experiences. Typically, you'd expect a global news leader to have excellent user feedback and flawless uptime. While the technical backbone appears sound, the current accessibility issues and a challenging Trustpilot score mean you should exercise caution. Keep an eye on its availability before relying on it for your daily news.