Homeβ€Ί Infrastructureβ€Ί weatherflow.pool.ntp.org
This site failed important safety checks β€” please read this before going any further.
Be careful β€” Suspicious

No β€” weatherflow.pool.ntp.org doesn't look safe

25/ 100 trust score
Industry: Infrastructure Checked Jul 17, 2026 Infrastructure average: 48 17 signals

In plain English

I'd steer clear of weatherflow.pool.ntp.org. The SSL certificate is invalid and belongs to a different site, and the domain immediately redirects to another address with no explanation. There's no history, no branding, and no way to know who's running it β€” all signs that something isn't right.

What you should do now

Don't panic. These steps limit the damage, and the sooner you take them the better.

1

Don't enter any details

No passwords, card numbers or personal information β€” even if the site looks professional.

2

Close the tab

Especially if you got here from an email, text message or social media ad.

3

Already paid? Call your bank

Contact your bank or card provider right away. They can often stop or reverse a recent payment.

4

Warn others

Report the site and share this check with anyone who sent you the link.

N Partner pick
Better safe than sorry. Stay covered everywhere: NordVPN's Threat Protection blocks known scam sites before they load.
Try NordVPN β†’
Cross-referenced 17 live signals from Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, WHOIS and more on Jul 17, 2026. How we score β†’

Where the score comes from

We look at six areas. Here's how weatherflow.pool.ntp.org did in each.
20
Security

The SSL certificate is invalid and issued for a completely different domain, meaning any connection to this server can't be trusted. A legitimate infrastructure service like a time server would have a properly configured certificate.

20
Identity

Who operates this site is essentially unknown. The WHOIS query failed, there's no web archive history, and the site redirects to an unrelated domain with no explanation. For any service, this level of anonymity is a red flag.

50
Reputation

No blacklists or Google Safe Browsing flags, but the redirect to galsys.fr and the lack of any Wayback Machine presence mean there's no track record to rely on. Mixed signals that don't add much confidence.

20
Transparency

The site has no branding, no favicon, and no content of its own. It immediately redirects visitors to a different domain, making it impossible to see who is behind it or what it offers.

60
Compliance

As an infrastructure service, this site wouldn't normally need legal pages. Since it doesn't collect data or offer a commercial service, the lack of compliance documents isn't a concern here.

40
Infrastructure

DNS resolves and email authentication is configured, but DNSSEC is missing and the SSL issue undermines the whole setup. Multiple hosting providers suggest a distributed setup, but the core technical trust is broken.

What we checked

The 17 signals behind this report.
Security & Transport
Certificate Issuer
Let's Encrypt
Google Web Risk
Clean
SSL Certificate
Invalid
Site Reachable
Unreachable
Identity & WHOIS
Branding
Missing
Infrastructure & DNS
DNS Blacklists
Clean
DNS Resolution
4 IP(s)
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Email (MX Records)
1 record(s)
Hosting Network (ASN)
AS12876 Online SAS
SPF Record
Present
Reputation & Reach
Sitemap
Not found
Tranco Rank
Not ranked
Trustpilot
No Trustpilot profile
Web Archive History
No archive found
robots.txt
Not found
Other
Site Redirect
Redirects to www.galsys.fr

Think this verdict is wrong?

Site owners can request a fresh scan. Scores update automatically as signals change.

This domain appears to be a subdomain of the NTP pool project, but it doesn't function as a reliable time server. Instead, it redirects visitors to galsys.fr, and its SSL certificate is tied to an unrelated site. Legitimate time servers maintain valid certificates matching their own domain and don't send users elsewhere. If you're considering using weatherflow.pool.ntp.org for any service β€” especially one that requires accurate time synchronization or secure connections β€” the red flags here should give you pause. The lack of web archive history, hidden ownership, and broken security setup make it impossible to verify the operator's intentions. For now, there's simply not enough trustworthy evidence to recommend using this site.

More Infrastructure sites

How similar sites score. See all β†’