Is wikimedia.org legit?

85
/ 100
Trusted
Industry: Nonprofit

This site is highly trusted, benefiting from an excellent online track record and robust foundational security. While there are a few minor technical improvements available, its core reliability and user safety are well-established.

Nonprofit average: 81/100 · based on 19 sites

Checked: April 21, 2026 at 1:19 PM UTC

Is wikimedia.org a scam? Here's what we found.

Security 90/100

The site boasts a strong security posture with modern TLS 1.3 encryption, HSTS enforcement, and a clean bill of health from Google Web Risk. The certificate expiry in 76 days is a minor point to watch.

Identity 95/100

With a domain age of over 23 years, the site demonstrates significant establishment and longevity. The usage of a reputable corporate registrar (MarkMonitor) further adds to its credibility, despite WHOIS redaction.

Reputation 95/100

Ranking 246 globally and being clean on all DNS blacklists, the site has an outstanding and well-established online presence and reputation. Its long history underscores its trustworthiness.

Transparency 85/100

The site provides clear contact information and essential legal pages like privacy and terms. While a lack of social media presence and basic branding might appear to reduce transparency, for a project of this nature, direct community engagement is often prioritized over broad social media marketing.

Compliance 95/100

The presence of both a privacy policy and terms of service highlights a commitment to regulatory and user compliance. These legal pages are crucial for user trust and data handling.

Infrastructure 80/100

The infrastructure is generally robust with good DNS resolution, effective email authentication (SPF, DMARC), and responsive website status. The absence of DNSSEC and certain common SEO files like robots.txt and sitemap are minor technical areas for improvement, and the internal-facing name servers are common for large organizations.

Signals Detected

[+]
Tranco Rank: Rank #246

This is one of the most visited websites globally

[?]
Structured Data: None found

No structured data markup found

[?]
Trustpilot: No Trustpilot profile

This business has no Trustpilot presence — not unusual for smaller or newer companies

[+]
SSL Certificate: Valid

Valid certificate, expires in 76 days

[?]
Certificate Issuer: Let's Encrypt

Certificate issued by Let's Encrypt

[+]
TLS Version: TLS 1.3

Connection uses TLS 1.3

[+]
DNS Resolution: 2 IP(s)

Resolves to: 2a02:ec80:300:ed1a::1, 185.15.59.224

[+]
Email (MX Records): 2 record(s)

Mail servers: mx-in2001.wikimedia.org., mx-in1001.wikimedia.org.

[+]
SPF Record: Present

Domain has SPF email authentication configured

[+]
DMARC Record: Present

Domain has DMARC email authentication configured

[?]
Name Servers: 3 server(s)

DNS providers: ns0.wikimedia.org., ns1.wikimedia.org., ns2.wikimedia.org.

[?]
robots.txt: Not found

No robots.txt file — common for small sites

[?]
Branding: Basic

Site has a favicon but no social sharing metadata

[+]
HSTS Header: Present

Site enforces HTTPS via HSTS

[?]
Server: ATS/9.2.13

Web server: ATS/9.2.13

[+]
Google Web Risk: Clean

No threats detected by Google Web Risk

[+]
Domain Age: 23 years, 5 months

Domain created 2003-03-16T08:22:47Z (23 years, 5 months ago)

[?]
Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.

Registered through MarkMonitor Inc.

[+]
Domain Expiry: 2027-03-16T08:22:47Z

Expires in 328 days

[+]
DNSSEC: unsigned

DNSSEC status from WHOIS

[?]
Sitemap: Not found

No sitemap found — common for smaller sites

[+]
Website Status: Online

Website is live and responding

[+]
Contact Info: Found

Website appears to have contact information

[+]
Legal Pages: Privacy & Terms found

Website has both privacy policy and terms of service pages

[~]
Social Media Presence: None found

No social media links found on homepage

[+]
DNS Blacklists: Clean

Not found on any DNS blacklists

[?]
Web Archive: Unable to check

Could not query Wayback Machine

[?]
Certificate Transparency: Unable to check

Could not query certificate transparency logs

[+]
Page Load Time: 84ms

Fast page load

Embed This Badge

Own this site? Show visitors your trust score.

Trust badge for wikimedia.org
<a href="https://verified.fyi/review/wikimedia.org"><img src="https://verified.fyi/badge/wikimedia.org?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark" alt="wikimedia.org trust score — verified.fyi" /></a>
[![wikimedia.org trust score](https://verified.fyi/badge/wikimedia.org?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark)](https://verified.fyi/review/wikimedia.org)

Stay Safe Online

Good habits to protect yourself, no matter the scan result.

Use a password manager

Never reuse passwords across sites.

Enable two-factor authentication

Add a second layer of security to your accounts.

Check before you buy

Always verify unfamiliar stores before entering payment info.

When evaluating a platform like wikimedia.org, the parent organization behind Wikipedia and other major public-knowledge projects, trustworthiness is paramount. Unlike an e-commerce site where you're concerned about product delivery, here the focus is on the integrity of information and the security of a global resource. Wikimedia.org stands out with a remarkable domain age exceeding 23 years. For a non-profit organization operating at this scale, such longevity is a gold standard, far surpassing what one might see from newer educational or informational platforms. This deep history signifies stability and a consistent mission, which are key indicators of reliability. Another critical aspect for an informational hub is its infrastructure. Wikimedia.org employs advanced email authentication (SPF and DMARC) and secure DNS settings. This isn't just technical jargon; it means they've taken significant steps to prevent spoofing and ensure that communications you receive are genuinely from them. While basic legal pages and contact info are standard, for a site of this global importance, these elements are crucial for accountability. While we did note a few minor technical points, such as the short expiry window on the SSL certificate or the lack of a robots.txt file, these are easily addressed operational details rather than fundamental security flaws. Compared to what one expects from a legitimate, globally impactful non-profit, Wikimedia.org delivers a highly secure and dependable online experience, making it a trustworthy pillar of online information.