Is cambridge.org legit?

72
/ 100
Mostly Safe
Industry: Education

This site, cambridge.org, appears Mostly Safe due to its strong technical foundation and long-standing presence, but lacks crucial transparency and compliance elements like easily accessible contact information and legal pages. While its high global rank suggests legitimacy, users should be aware of these missing pieces.

Education average: 81/100 · based on 35 sites

Checked: April 18, 2026 at 7:58 AM UTC · Refresh

Is cambridge.org a scam? Here's what we found.

Security 90/100

The security posture is robust with a valid SSL certificate from Google, modern TLS encryption, and excellent protection against common web attacks. Google Web Risk also finds no threats, indicating a secure browsing experience.

Identity 95/100

Its identity is exceptionally clear, with a domain that's almost three decades old and publicly registered through a reputable corporate registrar. The extensive web archive history further solidifies its long-term, established authenticity.

Reputation 95/100

Cambridge.org enjoys a very strong reputation, evidenced by its high global website ranking, an impressive history in web archives spanning 27 years, and being entirely free from any DNS blacklists. This indicates a well-known and respected online entity.

Transparency 60/100

Transparency is a weak point, as the site lacks readily apparent contact information and social media links on its homepage. While a favicon is present, the absence of basic informational elements for a site of this stature is notable.

Compliance 50/100

Compliance is concerning due to the complete absence of a privacy policy and terms of service, which are fundamental for any site, especially one potentially handling educational content or user data. The 403 status further hints at potential access or configuration issues.

Infrastructure 90/100

The underlying infrastructure is sound, utilizing Cloudflare for its server and robust DNS management. Strong email authentication (SPF and DMARC) is in place, reducing the risk of email spoofing and ensuring reliable communication.

Signals Detected

[+]
Tranco Rank: Rank #667

This is one of the most visited websites globally

[?]
Structured Data: None found

No structured data markup found

[?]
Trustpilot: No Trustpilot profile

This business has no Trustpilot presence — not unusual for smaller or newer companies

[+]
SSL Certificate: Valid

Valid certificate, expires in 56 days

[?]
Certificate Issuer: Google Trust Services

Certificate issued by Google Trust Services

[+]
TLS Version: TLS 1.2

Connection uses TLS 1.2

[+]
Clickjacking Protection: Present

X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

[?]
Server: cloudflare

Web server: cloudflare

[+]
Google Web Risk: Clean

No threats detected by Google Web Risk

[?]
Branding: Basic

Site has a favicon but no social sharing metadata

[+]
robots.txt: Present

robots.txt has 111 directives and references a sitemap

[+]
DNS Resolution: 2 IP(s)

Resolves to: 104.17.111.190, 104.17.110.190

[+]
Email (MX Records): 2 record(s)

Mail servers: eu-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com., eu-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com.

[+]
SPF Record: Present

Domain has SPF email authentication configured

[+]
DMARC Record: Present

Domain has DMARC email authentication configured

[+]
Name Servers: 2 server(s)

DNS providers: nucum.ns.cloudflare.com., lex.ns.cloudflare.com.

[~]
Website Status: HTTP 403

Website returned status 403

[~]
Contact Info: Not found

No obvious contact information found on homepage

[-]
Legal Pages: Missing

No privacy policy or terms of service found

[~]
Social Media Presence: None found

No social media links found on homepage

[?]
Sitemap: Not found

No sitemap found — common for smaller sites

[+]
DNS Blacklists: Clean

Not found on any DNS blacklists

[+]
Domain Age: 28 years, 4 months

Domain created 1998-04-18T04:00:00Z (28 years, 4 months ago)

[?]
Registrar: CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.

Registered through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.

[+]
Domain Expiry: 2026-12-30T16:00:04Z

Expires in 256 days

[+]
DNSSEC: unsigned

DNSSEC status from WHOIS

[+]
Web Archive History: 27 years

Earliest archive snapshot from 19981203

[?]
Certificate Transparency: Unable to check

Could not query certificate transparency logs

[+]
Page Load Time: 86ms

Fast page load

Embed This Badge

Own this site? Show visitors your trust score.

Trust badge for cambridge.org
<a href="https://verified.fyi/review/cambridge.org"><img src="https://verified.fyi/badge/cambridge.org?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark" alt="cambridge.org trust score — verified.fyi" /></a>
[![cambridge.org trust score](https://verified.fyi/badge/cambridge.org?size=medium&style=full&theme=dark)](https://verified.fyi/review/cambridge.org)

Stay Safe Online

Good habits to protect yourself, no matter the scan result.

Use a password manager

Never reuse passwords across sites.

Enable two-factor authentication

Add a second layer of security to your accounts.

Check before you buy

Always verify unfamiliar stores before entering payment info.

When evaluating the trustworthiness of a website like cambridge.org, which operates in the education sector as a major publisher, our approach differs from assessing an e-commerce store or a news site. For an educational institution or publisher, a long history, clear academic affiliations, and robust content integrity are paramount. Cambridge.org excels in its established identity and reputation, with a domain registered for over 28 years and a high global ranking, which aligns with expectations for a reputable educational body. However, what sets legitimate academic sites apart also includes transparency and compliance. A critical expectation for any organization dealing with intellectual property, research, or potentially user accounts (even for content access) is easily accessible legal policies, such as a privacy policy and terms of service. For cambridge.org, the absence of these documents is a significant red flag, despite its strong technical underpinnings. Users expect clear guidelines on data handling and site usage from such a prominent source. While its technical security is impressive, users should proceed with awareness regarding the lack of explicit legal frameworks. Furthermore, for a global entity like Cambridge University Press, readily available contact information and a visible social media presence are common and expected for support and engagement. Their absence suggests a gap in user-facing communication, which is unusual for a brand of this caliber. While the site's core content and services may be legitimate, the lack of these foundational elements means users should take extra care, particularly when considering interactions beyond content browsing.