Home Personal Blog graphitemaster.github.io
This site failed important safety checks — please read this before going any further.
Be careful — Suspicious

No — graphitemaster.github.io doesn't look safe

30/ 100 trust score
Industry: Personal Blog Checked Jul 8, 2026 Personal Blog average: 70 29 signals
Check another site

In plain English

This site is essentially a dead link. It returns a 404 error and has no history in the Wayback Machine, so there's no content to evaluate. Without any functioning page, there's no basis to trust it. If you were expecting a real site, you may have encountered a broken link or an abandoned project.

What you should do now

Don't panic. These steps limit the damage, and the sooner you take them the better.

1

Don't enter any details

No passwords, card numbers or personal information — even if the site looks professional.

2

Close the tab

Especially if you got here from an email, text message or social media ad.

3

Already paid? Call your bank

Contact your bank or card provider right away. They can often stop or reverse a recent payment.

4

Warn others

Report the site and share this check with anyone who sent you the link.

N Partner pick
Better safe than sorry. Stay covered everywhere: NordVPN's Threat Protection blocks known scam sites before they load.
Try NordVPN →
Cross-referenced 29 live signals from Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, WHOIS and more on Jul 8, 2026. How we score →

Where the score comes from

We look at six areas. Here's how graphitemaster.github.io did in each.
85
Security

Solid security setup with modern TLS, a valid certificate, and a content security policy. No blacklist or malware flags. This is what you'd expect from any GitHub Pages site.

70
Identity

The site is a subdomain of github.io, so the domain owner is GitHub itself – the individual behind the site isn't publicly exposed. That's normal for personal projects hosted here.

30
Reputation

The site returns a 404 error and has no history in the Wayback Machine. It's not ranked in web traffic lists. There's no evidence the site ever had content, which is a significant red flag for anyone expecting a functioning page.

40
Transparency

There's no about page, no contact information, and the only hint of a social media presence is a single link – but the page itself is a 404. For a personal blog, transparency isn't strictly required, but the complete absence of content makes it impossible to know who runs this site.

80
Compliance

No privacy policy or terms of service, but that's standard for a personal hobby site. There's no commercial activity here, so compliance obligations don't apply.

80
Infrastructure

The site uses Fastly's CDN and GitHub Pages for hosting, which is a reliable setup. DNS resolution is working, though DNSSEC isn't enabled – common for smaller sites.

What we checked

The 29 signals behind this report.
Security & Transport
Certificate Issuer
Let's Encrypt
Content Security Policy
Present
Google Web Risk
Clean
SSL Certificate
Valid
Security Headers
1 of 6
Server
GitHub.com
TLS Version
TLS 1.3
Identity & WHOIS
About Page
Not found
Branding
Missing
Business Disclosure
Not found
Contact Info
Not found
Legal Pages
Missing
Infrastructure & DNS
CDN
Fastly
DNS Blacklists
Clean
DNS Resolution
8 IP(s)
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Email (MX Records)
None
Hosting Network (ASN)
AS54113 FASTLY
Page Load Time
175ms
Reputation & Reach
Page Heading
404
Page Title
Site not found · GitHub Pages
Sitemap
Not found
Social Media Presence
1 platforms
Structured Data
None found
Tranco Rank
Not ranked
Trustpilot
No Trustpilot profile
Web Archive History
No archive found
Website Status
HTTP 404
robots.txt
Not found

Think this verdict is wrong?

Site owners can request a fresh scan. Scores update automatically as signals change.

Report this site

When you visit graphitemaster.github.io, you're met with a default GitHub Pages 404 page. That means the site either never had content or has been removed. For a personal project or blog, a 404 is a clear sign that the owner isn't actively maintaining it. There's no way to verify who runs it, no archive history, and no social media presence that actually leads anywhere. This doesn't make it a scam – there's nothing to scam you with – but it does mean you should treat it as a dead site. If you were looking for a specific resource here, double-check the URL or try the Wayback Machine. Otherwise, there's nothing to review or trust.

More Personal Blog sites

How similar sites score. See all →