Homeβ€Ί Personal Blogβ€Ί williamdue.github.io
This site failed important safety checks β€” please read this before going any further.
Be careful β€” Suspicious

No β€” williamdue.github.io doesn't look safe

25/ 100 trust score
Industry: Personal Blog Checked Jun 26, 2026 Personal Blog average: 70 27 signals
Check another site

In plain English

This site shows almost none of the hallmarks of a real organisation. It has no contact info, no about page, no web history, and no social presence β€” paired with an unreadable WHOIS record hidden behind a GitHub subdomain. If someone is trying to sell you something or collect your data here, walk away. If it's just a friend's personal playground, the opacity is less alarming, but the lack of transparency still makes it hard to trust anything hosted here.

What you should do now

Don't panic. These steps limit the damage, and the sooner you take them the better.

1

Don't enter any details

No passwords, card numbers or personal information β€” even if the site looks professional.

2

Close the tab

Especially if you got here from an email, text message or social media ad.

3

Already paid? Call your bank

Contact your bank or card provider right away. They can often stop or reverse a recent payment.

4

Warn others

Report the site and share this check with anyone who sent you the link.

N Partner pick
Better safe than sorry. Stay covered everywhere: NordVPN's Threat Protection blocks known scam sites before they load.
Try NordVPN β†’
Cross-referenced 27 live signals from Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, WHOIS and more on Jun 26, 2026. How we score β†’

Where the score comes from

We look at six areas. Here's how williamdue.github.io did in each.
88
Security

Strong setup: valid SSL with modern encryption, HSTS active, clean Safe Browsing status, and no blacklist hits. This is what you'd expect from any site that takes basic security seriously.

30
Identity

Who runs this? The WHOIS data is malformed and unreadable, and the domain is a GitHub subdomain with no real ownership trail. For a personal project that's normal, but for any venture asking for trust or money, this is a red flag.

35
Reputation

The site has no history in the Wayback Machine and zero web presence elsewhere β€” no social links, no reviews, no ranking. It looks like a brand-new or very low-effort project with no track record to lean on.

25
Transparency

There is no about page, no contact info, no social links, and no branding like a favicon. Legitimate businesses usually make themselves findable; this site does the opposite.

70
Compliance

No privacy policy or terms of service, but for a personal blog or hobby site like this one appears to be β€” a basic GitHub Pages site with a simple title β€” that's standard and expected. Nothing to penalize here.

72
Infrastructure

The site loads quickly behind Fastly's CDN with good uptime. DNS is clean though DNSSEC is off, and there's no email setup. Fine for a simple personal site, not for a business handling customer queries.

What we checked

The 27 signals behind this report.
Security & Transport
Certificate Issuer
Let's Encrypt
Google Web Risk
Clean
HSTS Header
Present
SSL Certificate
Valid
Security Headers
1 of 6
Server
GitHub.com
TLS Version
TLS 1.3
Identity & WHOIS
About Page
Not found
Branding
Missing
Business Disclosure
Not found
Contact Info
Not found
Legal Pages
Missing
Infrastructure & DNS
CDN
Fastly
DNS Blacklists
Clean
DNS Resolution
8 IP(s)
DNSSEC
Not enabled
Email (MX Records)
None
Page Load Time
187ms
Reputation & Reach
Page Title
Due's Website
Sitemap
Not found
Social Media Presence
None found
Structured Data
None found
Tranco Rank
Not ranked
Trustpilot
No Trustpilot profile
Web Archive History
No archive found
Website Status
Online
robots.txt
Not found

Think this verdict is wrong?

Site owners can request a fresh scan. Scores update automatically as signals change.

Report this site

Is williamdue.github.io safe? Based on what we found, the answer depends heavily on what you expect to do there. This is a GitHub Pages site with almost no public identity: no about page, no contact details, no social media links, and no history in the Wayback Machine. Combined with a malformed WHOIS record, that's a pattern you'd see in throwaway or experimental domains, not established projects.

That said, the site is technically sound β€” it uses modern encryption, loads fast on a reputable CDN (Fastly), and has no malware flags from Google. The security side is fine. The problem is transparency. When a site is this anonymous, it's hard to verify who's behind it or whether they'll act responsibly.

If this is just someone's personal blog or portfolio, the missing privacy policy and contact page are perfectly normal. But if you're being asked to share personal data, make a payment, or download software, there is no evidence here to support that trust. Most real services give you a way to contact them and a track record you can check. williamdue.github.io offers neither. Treat it as an unknown until proven otherwise.

More Personal Blog sites

How similar sites score. See all β†’